Google’s John Mueller mentioned on Twitter that simply because a bit of content material is written by a human, it doesn’t make that content material essentially useful and good content material. Having a human write content material will not assure the content material ranks properly in Google Search.
John mentioned, “Simply because one thing is human-written does not make it useful & good content material.” As a substitute, John recommended that you just “concentrate on making issues superior, distinctive, compelling, that folks suggest to associates – not simply one thing that is technically okay.”
Listed below are these tweets:
Simply because one thing is human-written does not make it useful & good content material. I might actually concentrate on making issues superior, distinctive, compelling, that folks suggest to associates – not simply one thing that is technically okay.
— 🦇 johnmu: cats usually are not folks 🦇 (@JohnMu) October 23, 2022
So can you might have machines write your content material? Effectively, John didn’t instantly say sure or no:
Sadly & fortunately, there is not any short-cut to creating one thing superior.
— 🦇 johnmu: cats usually are not folks 🦇 (@JohnMu) October 24, 2022
How does one outline useful or good content material?
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
