Daybreak Anderson requested Google’s John Mueller if redirecting a non-relevant web page would trigger the vacation spot web page (the place the redirect it going in direction of) to be much less related and trigger any rating points for its related queries. John mentioned no, “I am unable to consider a approach that will have a unfavourable impact there,” he added.
The dialog was on Mastodon and here’s what Daybreak requested:
Is it potential that 301 redirects from much less related pages (however not irrelevant to the goal URL), may really trigger goal URLs to be much less exact to queries given the folding collectively course of? i.e. much less precision since we all know there’s a folding collectively factor goes on (it was on an video on deduping by a Googler at a convention)
John Mueller replied:
I am unable to consider a approach that will have a unfavourable impact there. I’ve seen instances the place a URL may also rank for brand spanking new queries (eg grownup websites redirecting to a non-adult web page), however that should not negatively have an effect on the opposite queries that the web page ranks for.
The second a part of his reply can be fascinating, in regards to the short-term rating of redirected goal pages – however I would not get slowed down by that half.
One word, redirects from non-relevant pages could possibly be seen as gentle 404s by Google, Glenn Gabe did a case research on it and it jives with the redirect gentle 404s we lined right here quite a few instances.
Discussion board dialogue at Mastodon.
