by Chris Black
The examine checked out 30,712,101 people who had obtained numerous doses of the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines between 11 December 2020 and 15 January 2022.
They recognized 4 statistical indicators for elevated danger of acute myocardial infarction (ACI), pulmonary embolism (PE), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and immune thrombocytopenia following the Pfizer vaccine.
PEs (blood clots on the lungs) had been 54% extra seemingly, ACIs (coronary heart assaults) had been 42% extra seemingly, DICs (blood clotting dysfunction) had been 91% extra seemingly and ITPs (platelet dysfunction) 44% extra seemingly.
Nevertheless, they are saying that after additional analysis the speed ratios for AMI, DIC and ITP now not met the statistical threshold for a sign. However, even after their additional analysis, the speed ratio for PE nonetheless met the statistical threshold.
Comically/Tragically, after greater than two years of injecting folks, they name their monitoring examine an “early warning security system”!
They conclude that this FDA “early warning security system is working to quickly determine potential new and essential security issues following COVID-19 vaccination”.
Wow, I’m glad they didn’t use their slower system as a result of then we’d be in actual bother!
As typical and as you’d count on, they go to nice lengths to say that the 4 outcomes aren’t essentially attributable to the vaccine and could also be associated to different components.
Moreover, despite the fact that their very own examine has simply proven the elevated dangers to the aged, they are saying they BELIEVE the potential advantages of the vaccines outweigh the potential dangers of Covid an infection.
Since when has ‘consider’ been a scientific method of analyzing issues? It sounds extra like a non secular conviction.
Consequently, they gained’t be taking any regulatory actions based mostly on these indicators, as a result of they’re nonetheless beneath investigation and require extra strong examine.
So within the meantime, maintain taking your boosters and we’ll let you realize in possibly one other two years that sure the blood clots in your lungs had been from the vaccine.
However we nonetheless BELIEVE your blood clots had been higher than your Covid an infection, which you continue to received 5 occasions anyway – Amen.
I’m wondering which MSM shops will report on the FDAs personal examine
Hyperlink to the examine: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22014931
Most vaccination usually, not simply COVID vaccination, is pointless for most individuals.
Many diseases which are generally “vaccinated” towards are themselves very low-risk diseases with low An infection Fatality Charges.
Once you administer a vaccine, there may be at all times some quantity of danger of opposed response, like with some other drug. Once we take any sort of drug, we weigh danger towards reward.
Is the chance of taking the drug higher or lesser than the chance of not taking it?
On condition that the efficacy of vaccines and medicines usually is nearly at all times misrepresented by drug producers—by utilizing RELATIVE numbers as an alternative of ABSOLUTE ones—it’s comprehensible why so many individuals are confused as to the precise efficacy of vaccination.
Within the case of the COVID vaccine, it’s just about indeniable that it doesn’t defend you from COVID. No matter danger discount you get in any respect may be very, very small in absolute phrases.
Journal articles had been being revealed about this even within the early days of the vaccine rollout.
If we assume that there aren’t any actual dangers concerned in taking the vaccine, then in the very best case state of affairs, it’s principally snake oil.
The freebie photographs are ending and now there’s an entire contingency of brainwashed fools who will proceed to shell out for photographs that don’t work as a result of they’re petrified of catching a chilly.
Once more: assuming no danger in any respect…
