Google’s John Mueller stated lesser-used or recognized languages revealed on the internet aren’t thought-about low-quality content material simply because they’re lesser recognized. He stated on Mastodon “good content material is sweet content material” it doesn’t matter what language it’s written in.
Daniel Mealo requested, “Does the perfect suggestion at current change into to deindex such pages with to maintain from risking the notion that it’s low-quality content material, although they’re for a authentic localized audience?” Must you take away any such content material as a result of there isn’t a help hreflang ISO code for it? The reply is not any, in keeping with John Mueller.
John responded, “If that is good content material for a distinct segment viewers, I might completely *not* take away it from indexing. Good content material is sweet content material. Your web site will not be “penalized” for content material in an obscure language.” “There isn’t any ISO-639-1 code for historic Greek, and I would not dare counsel to take away that content material from the net,” he added.
So what do you do when there isn’t a ISO 639-1 code for the language and also you need to use hreflang? You do not use hreflang. John wrote earlier, “If there isn’t a ISO 639-1 code for a language, then there isn’t any hreflang that you would be able to specify there. A hreflang is not required for a web page. It does not should be part of a hreflang set, there isn’t any rating benefit if it have been.”
“The web page can have phrases in any language or script, our programs will attempt to index it appropriately, and attempt to present it to customers who seek for these phrases. It does not matter if there isn’t any ISO 639-1 nation code for it,” he added.
Discussion board dialogue at Mastodon.
